A bit of design documentation

In current poll somewhat surprising at first is a request for more detailed information on technologies. I think because of the absence in the survey item “Structures”, they also fell in the “Technology”. That is quite logical. And me personally, these topics are very interesting. Therefore, as far as possible will be to split out what is appropriate to the subject in its extended interpretation (including construction). I must say that information is not so much so – than the rich.

Spread a few fragments of the drawings. This is a documentation of the seemingly simplest home (House Plus.) And I am delighted with the quality and depth of study. To be honest, with such a long time not seen, but if we talk about low-rise housing construction, such drawings exist, perhaps, only in the release of typical units.

In general, everything worked out to the millimeter, and to the nail. Just take it and do what is projected. But here there are questions. For example, as many do we have left have specialists who are able to work so the documentation? Or even more fun: a lot of experts whether builders are able to translate it? It’s no secret that most of us builds on the principle of a “we have always done so” or “that depicted a fantasy designers – so we never did.” So the result after adjustment “aesthetes foreman” is obtained as usual – there is frozen, then proceeds, etc. And, it would seem to be easy … Well, all interesting – how far worked out the design documentation for maloetazhki? Especially considering the extreme thrift customers.